<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:56:37 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Journal</title><subtitle>Journal</subtitle><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/atom.xml"/><updated>2008-08-21T14:56:10Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Cost of deploying a mobile missile and artillery system able to close the Roki pass 10 million....stopping a Russian ground invasion.....priceless</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/22/cost-of-deploying-a-mobile-missile-and-artillery-system-able.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/22/cost-of-deploying-a-mobile-missile-and-artillery-system-able.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-22T18:35:00Z</published><updated>2008-08-22T18:35:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<span class="full-image-inline"><span><img  src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/SCOTT%7E1.GAR/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-6.jpg" alt=""></span></span><p style="font-size: 150%;"><strong><span class="full-image-inline"><span><img  src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/SCOTT%7E1.GAR/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-7.jpg" alt=""></span></span>For lifes best little moments...................</strong></p><span class="full-image-inline"><span><img  title="Tunnel" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" alt="Tunnel" src="http://blog.wired.com/defense/images/2008/08/18/tunnel.jpg" border="0" height="238" hspace="10" vspace="5" width="400"></span></span><p><span class="full-image-inline"><span><a id="icePage_SearchResults_ResultsRepeaterByRelevance_ResultDataList_ctl01_ImageResult_ImageThumb" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.cardweb.com/logos?D=D';return true" onmouseout="window.status='';return true;" href="http://www.dogpile.com/clickserver/_iceUrlFlag=1?rawURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cardweb.com%2Flogos%3FD%3DD&amp;0=&amp;1=0&amp;4=72.53.194.53&amp;5=68.200.150.16&amp;9=b31ff9c225c0424c8d1bc73312fdc801&amp;10=1&amp;11=info.dogpl&amp;13=search&amp;14=372380&amp;15=main-title&amp;17=2&amp;18=2&amp;19=0&amp;20=0&amp;21=2&amp;22=dwPoD4X6910%3D&amp;23=0&amp;40=kvInzbxkVo8vJWpfB5ABPg%3D%3D&amp;_IceUrl=true"><img  class="imageResultPane " id="icePage_SearchResults_ResultsRepeaterByRelevance_ResultDataList_ctl01_ImageResult_ThumbInnerImage" style="border: 1px solid ; width: 170px; height: 95px;" alt="mastercard_transparent_MC.gif" src="http://sp1.yt-thm-a01.yimg.com/image/25/m3/2504279032"></a></span></span></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>California Supremes rule there is no 1st amendment for doctors</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/california-supremes-rule-there-is-no-1st-amendment-for-docto.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/california-supremes-rule-there-is-no-1st-amendment-for-docto.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T14:12:30Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T14:12:30Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"></p>I have a few questions about <a href="">this ruling</a> by the California Supreme Court. <P><P>

The justice who wrote the opinion said that the state's gay rights laws override a doctor's right to turn down procedures he or she considers unethical "even if compliance poses an incidental conflict with the [doctor's] religious beliefs." I'm wondering, if a woman shows up at a pro-life doctor's OB clinic and demands he perform an abortion, will that be an "incidental" conflict too? <P><P>


Is it really denial of service for a doctor to refuse a procedure while referring the patient to a colleague who will do it and works <u>in the same office?</U><P><P>

I noticed that in ooral arguments one of the justices suggested that the OB/GYN find a new line of work. I wonder how proponents of gay rights would take it if a state inspector refused to give a lesbian a license for her day care and told her she should just find a new line of work. Or perhaps a better example is the state's licensing board pulling the license of a gay child psychologist. "Sorry you've spent years attaining this level of education, but you should go be a housepainter or a wedding planner or something, because we get to decide how and with whom you work."<P><P>

I wonder...if a psychologist (not a child psychologist, but one who handled adults) was a Muslim and didn't want to see a patient because she showed up for her appointments in minskirts and other revealing clothing, would California tell him to find a new line of work? If so, would gay activists protest on his behalf, or shrug their shoulders?<P><P>

Why exactly is the lesbian couple's ability to get a service from the first provider they approach more important than the doctor's right of religious 
conscience? To elaborate, which would you rather hear from a judge: "You will have to find another provider for the service you desire" or "You must violate your faith in Christ, or else?" Which one of those violates the 1st Amendment?<P><P>

If an atheist doesn't want to print tracts for me, should I be able to march into court and make him? How about if I have fliers for a "One Man One Woman" marriage rally? Should a gay printer raising three kids with a same-sex spouse be forced by a court of law to print them for me? <P><P>

If a lesbian works at a tattoo shop, and a skinhead walks in and wants a tat that reads "All gays should be beaten to death," should she have to do the tat or can she refer the skinhead to someone else? What if the customer were a Christian who wanted a tat with the text of an Old Testament prohibition against homosexual conduct? <P><P>

Fair questions about an unfair and tyrannical decision.<P><P>

Chris Clukey<BR>
Contributing Editor<P><P>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>obama says dont watch this film</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/obama-says-dont-watch-this-film.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/obama-says-dont-watch-this-film.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T14:10:20Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T14:10:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SaefcprW9Mg&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SaefcprW9Mg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Religous bigot Parker delivers Craptastic Randian anti christ rant at National Review Online, This women should get therapy</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/religous-bigot-parker-delivers-craptastic-randian-anti-chris.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/religous-bigot-parker-delivers-craptastic-randian-anti-chris.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T13:58:56Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T13:58:56Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<span class=articledate>August 20, 2008, 0:00 a.m.</span><br><em><br>Parker is wrong on so many levels</em><br>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>Interrogation </strong></em>??? What is terrorizing about a discussion with a religious person ? Did I miss Warren water boarding his guests ? </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>The loser was America</em>. T</strong>he loser was religious bigots like Ms. Parker who seek to send the religious to the back of the bus<strong> !</strong> </li>
</ul><em><br></em>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>It is also un-American</strong></em>. Who appointed Ms. Parker the pope of the church of Ayn Rand ? Why is she the the arbitrator of Americana ? What the hell is "American" anyway ? </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>This is about higher principles that are compromised every time we pretend we’re not applying a religious test when we’re really applying a religious test</em>. </strong>Higher principles ? On what basis is Parker able to condemn religious tests her epistemology allows for no right or wrong being based on the sacred writ of the whoremaster Jefferson ? </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>religious test ? Gee I missed the questions on transubstantiation,Trinity and&nbsp; proper church government </em>.&nbsp;</strong> </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>but viewers would be justified in squirming.</strong></em> The people liked it ! Ms. Parker only a handful of Atheists&nbsp; whos hatred&nbsp; of God is so&nbsp; unchained&nbsp; they couldn't sit and learn squirmed.......can we say DIVERSITY. Guilt issues Ms. Parker ?<br></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>What’s next? Interrogations by rabbis, priests, and imams.</em> </strong>The last bastion of a defeat premise the "slippery slope " canard.I'm fine with all that. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>secular laws. Oh like the polygamy&nbsp; laws or laws of consanguinity&nbsp;</strong></em> </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>What would have happened to Thomas Jefferson if he had responded as he wrote in 1781: “It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg</em>.</strong>” Thomas Jefferson approved of sending Bibles to the Native American tribes. I suppose he was violating his own sacred principles? Thomas Jefferson would have gone down in flames if the farmers and preachers had the web ; he benefited from a paper monopoly on information. Jefferson was a whore master and just one of the Founding Fathers. What about Patrick Henry or George Washington ?<br></li>
</ul>
<ul></ul><span class=articletitle>Purpose-Driven Politics</span><br><span class=articlesubtitle>What were John McCain and Barack Obama doing at Saddleback?</span><br><br><span class=articlesubtitle>By Kathleen Parker</span><br><br><span class=drop>A</span>t the risk of heresy, let it be said that setting up the two presidential candidates for religious interrogation by an evangelical minister — no matter how beloved — is supremely wrong.<br><br>It is also un-American.<br><br>For the past several days, since mega-pastor Rick Warren interviewed Barack Obama and John McCain at his Saddleback Church, most political debate has focused on who won. <br><br>Was it the nuanced, thoughtful Obama, who may have convinced a few more skeptics that he isn’t a Muslim? Or was it the direct, confident McCain, who breezes through town-hall-style meetings the way Obama sinks three-pointers from the back court. <br><br>Suffice it to say, each of the candidates’ usual supporters felt validated in their choices. McCain convinced and comforted with characteristic certitude those most at ease with certitude; Obama convinced and comforted with his characteristic intellectual ambivalence those most at ease with ambivalence.<br><br>The winner, of course, was Warren, who has managed to position himself as political arbiter in a nation founded on the separation of church and state.<br><br>The loser was America.<br><br>In his enormously successful book, <em>The Purpose-Driven Life</em>, Warren begins: “It’s not about you.” Agreed. Nor is this criticism aimed at Christians, evangelicals, other believers or non-believers — or at Warren, who is a good man with an exemplary record of selfless works. Few have walked the walk with as much determination or success. <br><br>This is about higher principles that are compromised every time we pretend we’re not applying a religious test when we’re really applying a religious test. <br><br>It is true that no one was forced to participate in the Saddleback Forum and that both McCain and Obama are free agents. Warren certainly has a right to invite whomever he wishes to his church and to ask them whatever they’re willing to answer. <br><br>His format and questions were interesting and the answers more revealing than the usual debate menu provides. But does it not seem just a little bit odd to have McCain and Obama chatting individually with a preacher in a public forum about their positions on evil and their relationship with Jesus Christ?<br><br>The past few decades of public confession and Oprah-style therapy have prepared us perfectly for a televangelist probing politicians about their moral failings. The Warren Q&amp;A wasn’t an inquisition exactly, but viewers would be justified in squirming. <br><br>What is the right answer, after all? What happens to the one who gets evil wrong? What’s a proper relationship with Jesus? What’s next? Interrogations by rabbis, priests, and imams? What candidate dare decline on the basis of mere principle?<br><br>Both Obama and McCain gave “good” answers, but that’s not the point. They shouldn’t have been asked. Is the American electorate now better prepared to cast votes knowing that Obama believes that “Jesus Christ died for my sins and I am redeemed through him,” or that McCain feels that he is “saved and forgiven”?<br><br>What does that mean, anyway? What does it prove? Nothing except that these men are willing to say whatever they must — and what most Americans personally feel is no one’s business — to win the highest office. <br><br>Warren tried to defuse criticism about staging the interviews in his church by saying that though “we” believe in the separation of church and state, “we” don’t believe in the separation of faith and politics. Faith, he said, “is just a worldview, and everybody has some kind of worldview. It’s important to know what they are.”<br><br>Presumably “we” refers to Warren’s church of fellow evangelicals. And while, yes, everybody has some kind of worldview, it shouldn’t be necessary in a pluralistic nation of secular laws to publicly define that view in Christian code. <br><br>For the moment, let’s set aside our curiosity about what Jesus might do in a given circumstance and wonder what our founding fathers would have done at Saddleback Church. What would have happened to Thomas Jefferson if he had responded as he wrote in 1781: “It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”<br><br>Would the crowd at Saddleback have applauded and nodded through that one? Doubtful. <br><br>By today’s new standard of pulpits in the public square, Jefferson — the great advocate for religious freedom in America — would have lost. <br><br><span class=bioline><em>— Kathleen Parker is author of</em> <A href="http://www.nationalreview.com/redirect/amazon.p?j=1400065798">Save the Males</A>. </span>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Things are going well in Iraq when to most depressing negitive story line the Jihads press advocates can find is this</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/things-are-going-well-in-iraq-when-to-most-depressing-negiti.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/things-are-going-well-in-iraq-when-to-most-depressing-negiti.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T12:41:38Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T12:41:38Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="post-info">
	
			<small class="post-date" id="day_20">August 20, 2008,&nbsp; 3:47 pm</small>
	
	
		<h2 class="post-title">Iraq’s Squeegee Men – In Your Face</h2>
	
		<p class="post-author">By <span><a href="http://baghdadbureau.blogs.nytimes.com/author/sfarrell/" title="Posts by Stephen Farrell">the liberal NYT<br></a></span></p>
			</div><!-- end post-info -->

	<div class="post-content">
	<p>It’s
seventh circle of hell hot, you’re stuck in a traffic jam with four
million people heading to the same pilgrimage, and Iraq’s version of
the Squeegee Man dashes out into the road to wash you down. </p>
<p>Not your windshield. You.</p>
<div class="inlineVideo left">
<p>&nbsp;</p></div>
<p>But this is Baghdad, not New York or London. It’s 120 degrees, and
your only air conditioning is an open window. So instead of closing it
you lean out and take a welcome jet of rose-scented water in the face,
to refresh you on the way to Karbala for a Shiite festival.</p>
<p>In Iraq the Squeegee Man is a service, not a scam.
</p>
	</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dedicated to the memory of allen scott mathieu</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/dedicated-to-the-memory-of-allen-scott-mathieu.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/dedicated-to-the-memory-of-allen-scott-mathieu.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T11:50:25Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T11:50:25Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AkyAfXVpVrM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AkyAfXVpVrM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Obama picks Flava Flave as running mate</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/obama-picks-flava-flave-as-running-mate.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/obama-picks-flava-flave-as-running-mate.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T11:46:20Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T11:46:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>shameless attempt to drive up web hit count<br></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Vlad Putin just elected John McCain...or should I say President Elect mccain</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/vlad-putin-just-elected-john-mccainor-should-i-say-president.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/21/vlad-putin-just-elected-john-mccainor-should-i-say-president.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-21T01:09:48Z</published><updated>2008-08-21T01:09:48Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<h2 id="headline">Russia Makes New Threats Over U.S.-Poland Missile Deal</h2>

<h3 id="dek">Plan Said to Defend Against Regimes Like Iran, but Some See It as Shield for Poland Against Russia</h3>

<h4 id="byline">By TOMEK ROLSKI and JONATHAN KARL</h4>

<p>
<strong>MOSCOW, Aug. 20, 2008</strong> 
</p>

<p>

</p><p>
Russia's foreign ministry today threatened to go beyond diplomatic
protests in response to the signing of a U.S.-Polish deal to base part
of an American missile defense system in Poland, which borders part of
Russia.
</p><p>The latest threat came after a top Russian general said Poland
would risk a military strike if it allowed the base and as U.S.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dismissed Russia's saber rattling,
saying the threats "border on the bizarre."
</p><p>"When you threaten Poland, you perhaps forget that it is not
1988," Rice said, according to The Associated Press. "It's 2008 and the
United States has a ... firm treaty guarantee to defend Poland's
territory as if it was the territory of the United States. So it's
probably not wise to throw these threats around."
</p><p>But in addition to the threats, Russia may be making a more
concrete move. Norway's defense ministry claims Russia has told it that
it plans to cut all military ties with NATO, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=5619261">The Associated Press reports</a>.
</p><p>
The United States insists that the missile defense deal signed with
Poland today is meant to protect the West from rogue states like Iran
and North Korea. Poland, however, sees this as defense against Russia,
a closer, and much more powerful, potential adversary.
</p><p>Hours before inking the pact with Rice, Poland's President Lech
Kaczynski addressed his nation on TV and declared, "No one will ever
again tell Poland what to do and what not to do."
</p><p>He was likely referring to Russia, which invaded Poland in 1939
and asserted control over the Polish government until the collapse of
the Warsaw Pact in 1990.
</p><p>Kaczynski's defiant speech came a week after Russia angrily
warned that allowing U.S. missile interceptors on Polish soil put
Poland at risk of a military strike.
</p><p>"If Poland allows elements of the U.S. missile shield to be
placed in its territory it will expose itself to a strike ... and
that's a hundred percent sure," threatened deputy head of Russia's
General Staff Col. Gen. Anatoly Nogovitsyn.
</p><p>Nogovitsyn's comment was particularly menacing, since it came
days after Russian forces invaded its neighbor Georgia in a spat over
the province of South Ossetia.
</p><p>
"It's Georgia today, Ukraine tomorrow and Poland may be next," Kaczynski said.
</p><p>
<!-- page -->Today, Russia's foreign ministry issued a new threat --
implying that Russia was the target of the new missile base and not
some "imaginary Iranian danger."
</p><p>"Russia in this case will have to react, and not only through
diplomatic protests," said a statement from the ministry, according to
Reuters.
</p><p>The statement described the missile shield as "one of the
instruments in an extremely dangerous bundle of American military
projects involving the one-sided development of a global missile shield
system."
</p><p>According to the deal, the United States will construct a
military base at Redzikowo on the Baltic coast. There, on an area no
larger than the size of a football field, will be 10 silos with
missiles ready for possible launch by 2012.
</p><p>The relatively small missile defense system could be easily
overwhelmed by Russia's vast force of long-range missiles, but under
the deal the United States also agreed to provide a Patriot missile
defense system that could be used to defend Poland against a
short-range missile defense threat that could potentially come from
Russia.
</p><p>In today's pact, the United States and Poland agreed to a
"mutual commitment" to come to each other's assistance "in case of
military or other threats."
</p><p>Aleksander Szczyglo, defense minister in Poland's previous
government, went so far as to call today's signing one of three
significant "milestones" since Poland regained full independence in
1989.
</p><p>"First was NATO membership, then joining the European Union and
now a tangible tightening of our alliance with the U.S.," he said.
</p><p>Russia's renewed assertiveness and its invasion of Georgia has
fortified fears that the Kremlin may attempt to regain its spheres of
influence and meddle in Polish affairs.
</p><p>"Russia wants to regain influence over Poland, similar to
influence Russia enjoyed during the time of the Warsaw Pact," military
analyst Michal Fiszer told ABC News. "Any increase in Polish defense
and security goes against those plans."
</p><p>It would seem that as a member of NATO and the European Union
Poland should feel it has enough security guarantees. But many Polish
politicians express frustration with Western Europe's approach to
Russia as too submissive and vulnerable to Russian oil and gas
blackmail.
</p><p>
<!-- page -->Only weeks ago, the 18 months of Polish-U.S. missile talks
appeared on the verge of collapse. The Poles suspended negotiations
after the United States refused to meet their demands and public
opinion polls found that 70 percent of Poles were against the missile
shield on their territory. Poles began protesting the plan.
</p><p>
All that changed on Aug. 8, when Russian armor rolled into Georgia.
</p><p>"When Russia performs military operations that are perceived as
aggressive and brutal, even relatively far from our borders, people in
Poland fear," political analyst Grzegorz Kostrzewa-Zorbas told ABC
News.
</p><p>"The war in Georgia very quickly and suddenly changed the mood
of Poles," Kostrzewa-Zorbas said. "In a week, a strong majority emerged
supporting the American missile shield in Poland."
</p><p>
Now, 63 percent support American military presence on Polish soil and feel that the closer ties enhance Poland's security.
</p><p>
The American side also had a large shift in opinion.
</p><p>"The Americans were unwilling to give Poland any anti-missile
and air defense system optimized to defend Polish airspace and
territory. They did not want to give Poland Patriot missiles," he said.
"Now it is different."
</p><p>Pawel Zaleski, a member of the Polish parliament, told ABC News
that it is clear that Russia is trying to "create an area of domination
around its borders."
</p><p>"People in Poland do remember history, and they understand what
it means to have such a neighbor returning to his old ways," Zaleski
said. "People see the war in Georgia ... so of course it creates an
impact on people's thinking."
</p><p>Marek Ostrowsk, an analyst for the Polityka weekly, told ABC
News that Poland traditionally has more confidence in the United States
than its European alliances.
</p><p>"Traditionally and historically, we think America is more
reliable than Europe," Ostrowsk said. "In 1918, we regained
independence thanks to the U.S. When World War II began in 1939, we
were let down by our allies, Britain and France. But the U.S. has never
failed us."
</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Blast from the past for younger americans Ronald "dutch" reagan</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/blast-from-the-past-for-younger-americans-ronald-dutch-reaga.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/blast-from-the-past-for-younger-americans-ronald-dutch-reaga.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-20T14:27:48Z</published><updated>2008-08-20T14:27:48Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[My fellow Americans. I'm pleased to announce that I've signed
legislation outlawing the Soviet Union. We begin bombing in five
minutes." -joking during a mike check before his Saturday radio
broadcast]]></content></entry><entry><title>Unchained, and you hit me back running Michael Moore this is Karma !</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/unchained-and-you-hit-me-back-running-michael-moore-this-is.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/unchained-and-you-hit-me-back-running-michael-moore-this-is.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-20T13:53:53Z</published><updated>2008-08-20T13:53:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gzTQ4Lk1nug&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gzTQ4Lk1nug&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

American Carol !]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dedicated to my friends in special boat sevice</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/dedicated-to-my-friends-in-special-boat-sevice.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/dedicated-to-my-friends-in-special-boat-sevice.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-20T13:31:44Z</published><updated>2008-08-20T13:31:44Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tNUc1c527LE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tNUc1c527LE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Obama meltdown,never has a Democrat been in so much trouble so early</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/obama-meltdownnever-has-a-democrat-been-in-so-much-trouble-s.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/20/obama-meltdownnever-has-a-democrat-been-in-so-much-trouble-s.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-20T11:24:42Z</published><updated>2008-08-20T11:24:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<em><a href="">MCCAIN PULLS AHEAD 'BY 5 POINTS'</a><br><br></em>
<div id="center">
<div id="centerbody"><table id="ctl00_maincontent_FeedList" style="border-collapse: collapse;" border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div id="story">
<h2><span id="ctl00_maincontent_FeedList_ctl00_TitleLabel">No Contest</span></h2>
<p class="artdetails">By <span id="ctl00_maincontent_FeedList_ctl00_AuthorText">INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY</span> 
| Posted Monday, August 18, 2008 4:20 PM PT </p>
<p class="lead"><strong>Election '08:</strong> Last weekend's McCain-Obama protodebate made 
it clear why Obama won't keep his promise to debate McCain "anywhere, anytime." 
McCain, with a robust resume and details at his fingertips, won big.</p>
<hr size="1">

<p>Read More: <strong><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/FeaturedCategories.aspx?sid=1823&amp;cid=1803">Election 
2008</a></strong> | <strong><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/FeaturedCategories.aspx?sid=1813">Religion</a></strong> 
<br>
</p><hr size="1">


<p>It was only in May that Sen. Barack Obama cockily proclaimed he would debate 
Sen. John McCain "anywhere, anytime." But in June, Obama said no to McCain's 
challenge to have 10 one-on-one town hall meetings.</p>
<p>After what happened at Lake Forest, Calif.'s evangelical Saddleback 
megachurch Saturday evening, we may have found that debating is Obama's 
Achilles' heel. Whether or not you like the idea of such events being held in 
religious venues, the plain-and-simple method of questioning used by Saddleback 
pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren revealed fundamental differences 
between these two men.</p>
<p>"It's one of those situations where the devil is in the details," Obama said 
at one point. He could have been referring to his own oratorical shortcomings 
when a teleprompter is unavailable. We learned a lot more about the real Obama 
at Saddleback than we will next week as he delivers his acceptance speech in 
Denver before a massive stadium crowd.</p>
<p>The stark differences between the two came through the most on the question 
of whether there is evil in the world. Obama spoke of evil within America, "in 
parents who have viciously abused their children." According to the Democrat, we 
can't really erase evil in the world because "that is God's task." And we have 
to "have some humility in how we approach the issue of confronting evil." </p>
<p>For McCain, with a global war on terror raging, there was no equivocating: We 
must "defeat" evil. If al-Qaida's placing of suicide vests on mentally-disabled 
women and then blowing them up by remote control in a Baghdad market isn't evil, 
he asked: "You have to tell me what is."</p>
<p>Asked to name figures he would rely on for advice, Obama gave the stock 
answer of family members. McCain pointed to Gen. David Petraeus, Iraq's scourge 
of the surge; Democratic Rep. John Lewis, who "had his skull fractured" by white 
racists while protesting for civil rights in the 60s; plus Internet entrepreneur 
Meg Whitman, the innovative former CEO of eBay.</p>
<p>When Warren inquired into changes of mind on big issues, Obama fretted about 
welfare reform; McCain unashamedly said "drilling" — for reasons of national 
security and economic need. </p>
<p>On taxes, Obama waxed political: "What I'm trying to do is create a sense of 
balance and fairness in our tax code." McCain showed an understanding of what 
drives a free economy: "I don't want to take any money from the rich. I want 
everybody to get rich. I don't believe in class warfare or redistribution of the 
wealth." </p>
<p>To any honest observer, the differences between John McCain and Barack Obama 
have been evident all along. What we saw last weekend was Obama's shallowness 
juxtaposed with McCain's depth, the product of his extraordinary life 
experience. </p>
<p>It may not have been a debate, but it was one of the most lopsided political 
contests in memory. No wonder Obama wants to keep debate formats boring and 
predictable. </p>
</div></td></tr></tbody></table>
<p class="centered"><a href="http://ui.constantcontact.com/sa/fp.jsp?plat=i&amp;p=f&amp;m=nzwhm9bab"></a></p><br></div>
<div id="centerbottomleft">
</div></div>
<div id="footer"><a id="ctl00_lnkServerName" href="http://IBDEDWEB1"><img  style="border-width: 0px;" alt="" src="images/px.gif" height="10" width="10"></a> </div><br><em><br></em>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Prediction...Clintons to unleash massive obama scandal...Hillary vs McCain take it to the bank</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/19/predictionclintons-to-unleash-massive-obama-scandalhillary-v.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/19/predictionclintons-to-unleash-massive-obama-scandalhillary-v.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-19T22:50:28Z</published><updated>2008-08-19T22:50:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>Prediction Billary will unleash a massive scandal and then with reservations accept the nomination !</strong><br></p><p><br></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Barry Soetoro Obama is trounced at Brokeback Church, Obama Team screams cheating "come on who can out do the messiah " ?</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/19/barry-soetoro-obama-is-trounced-at-brokeback-church-obama-te.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/19/barry-soetoro-obama-is-trounced-at-brokeback-church-obama-te.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-19T00:01:30Z</published><updated>2008-08-19T00:01:30Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 150%;"><br>Huffpost</span><br><br>Oh my gosh - and right in there, after Warren said "We'll get to that," did I 
just hear McCain say something about "yeah, and when we speak about the rights 
of the unborn we can talk about judges..." ??????<br><br>"The rights of the 
unborn" were Warren's exact words to Obama.<br>Do I have this right that the 
topic had not yet come up with McCain?<br><br>I believe that makes THREE cases 
of him knowing specific topics BEFORE they were ever brought up! <br><br>If you 
didn't check out the "youtube" on the post above, you need to. Note that you 
need to wait or go to 3 minutes and 25 seconds in. Keep listening!<br><br>No 
wonder McCain was so excited and up and giddy. He acted like the cat who just 
ate the canary. Apparently he did!<br><p><br></p><p><br></p><br>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Obama is a muslim !</title><id>http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/18/obama-is-a-muslim.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/journal/2008/8/18/obama-is-a-muslim.html"/><author><name>Scott</name></author><published>2008-08-18T23:03:59Z</published><updated>2008-08-18T23:03:59Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
<!-- end option --><!-- leadin graphic --><img  alt="WND Exclusive" src="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/images/header_exclusive.gif" border="0" height="20" width="181"><!-- end leadin graphic --> 
<hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
<!-- standing head --><span color="#440000" style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-1;"><strong>ELECTION 2008</strong></span><br><!-- end standing head --><!-- head --><span color="#000000" style="font-family: Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="+2;">Was young Obama Indonesian citizen?</span><br><!-- end head --><!-- deck --><font color="#000000" face="Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="+1">Document, travel suggest 'Barry Soetero' member of world's largest 
Muslim country</font><br><!-- end deck -->
<hr size="1">
<font size="-1">Posted: August 17, 2008<br>8:18 pm Eastern<br><br></font>
<p><font face="Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif">By Aaron 
Klein</font><font size="-1"> 
<!-- end copyright --></font>
</p><p>
</p><div class="KonaBody" ufudm="true"><!-- begin bodytext -->
<p>
<table align="right" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="320"><img  src="http://www.thermonuclearthought.com/images/ObamaIndonesia.jpg" border="0" height="339" width="320"><br><span style="font-size: xx-small; font-family: arial;">Indonesian 
school registration for "Barry Soetoro" (AP 
photo)</span></td></tr></tbody></table></p>
<p>JERUSALEM – Was Sen. <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink0" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,0);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,0);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,0);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="border-bottom: 1px solid blue; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative; background-color: transparent;">Barack 
</span><span class="kLink" style="border-bottom: 1px solid blue; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative; background-color: transparent;">Obama</span></font></a> 
a citizen of Indonesia at any point in his life?</p>
<p>That question has been circulating on the blogosphere with increased fury the 
past few days, since a photograph emerged of Obama's school registration papers 
as a child in Indonesia – the world's most populous Muslim nation – showing the 
presidential candidate listed as a "Muslim" with "Indonesian" <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink1" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,1);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,1);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,1);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative;">citizenship</span></font></a>.</p>
<p>An investigation into Indonesian citizenship law and a review of Obama's 
biography and <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink2" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,2);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,2);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,2);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative;">travels</span></font></a> 
suggest the Illinois senator at one point may have been a citizen of Indonesia. 
That would not necessarily disqualify Obama to run for president, but it could 
raise loyalty concerns.</p>
<p>A 2007 Associated Press photograph taken by Tatan Syuflana, an Indonesian AP 
reporter and photographer, surfaced last week on the <a href="http://www.daylife.com/photo/01u33pL9Ns06D">Daylife.com photographic 
website</a> showing an image of Obama's registration card at Indonesia's 
Fransiskus Assisi school, a Catholic institution.</p>
<p>In the picture, Obama is registered under the name Barry Soetoro by his 
stepfather, Lolo Soetoro. The school card lists Barry Soetoro as a Indonesian 
citizen born Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. His religion is listed as 
Muslim.</p>
<p>Jack Stokes, manager of media relations for the AP, confirmed to WND the 
picture is indeed an AP photo.</p>
<p>After attending the Assisi Primary School, Obama later was enrolled at SDN 
Menteng 1, an Indonesian public school.</p>
<p>Obama's campaign did not return repeated WND phone calls and e-mail queries 
the past week asking for a clarification regarding the school documentation 
listing the presidential candidate's citizenship as Indonesian.</p>
<p>Obama spokesmen have stated the candidate is a natural-born citizen amid 
rumors he may have been born in his father's home country of Kenya, but the 
campaign has not addressed whether Obama became a citizen of Indonesia at any 
point.</p>
<p><em>(Story continues below)</em></p>
<p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">




<div id="google_ads_div_WND_NWS_C0200"></div></td>
<td width="10">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top">




<div id="google_ads_div_WND_NWS_C0201">

</div></td>
<td width="10">&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table></p>
<p>Obama's American mother, Ann Dunham, separated from her first husband, Barack 
Obama Sr., in 1963 when the presidential candidate was two years old. Dunham and 
Obama Sr. are reported to have later divorced. Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an 
Indonesian, and moved to Indonesia sometime between 1966 and 1967.</p>
<p>It was not clear whether Soetoro adopted Obama, either in Hawaii or in 
Indonesia, but there is strong circumstantial evidence that he did as far as 
Indonesian law was concerned.</p>
<p>In Indonesia, which was under tight rule in 1967, Obama clearly took on the 
last name of his stepfather in school registration documents. All Indonesian 
students were required to carry government identity cards, or Karty Tanda 
Pendudaks, which needed to bear the student's legal name, which should be 
matched in public school registration filings.</p>
<p>Following his enrollment at the private Assisi school, Obama attended public 
schooling in Indonesia until he returned to Hawaii at age 10. According to 
Indonesian legal experts, it was difficult to enroll non-Indonesian citizens in 
public schooling.</p>
<p>Obama arrived in Indonesia at about the age of five according to most 
accounts, although it was possible he arrived at the age of six, according to a 
few sources. If Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama at age five or younger, then Obama 
would automatically have become an Indonesian citizen according to the country's 
laws in the 1960's, which stipulated any child aged five or younger adopted by 
an Indonesian father is immediately granted Indonesian citizenship upon 
completion of the adoption process.</p>
<p>Lolo Soetoro could have adopted Obama in Hawaii, although such an adoption 
would not have necessarily been recognized by Indonesia.</p>
<p>Indonesian law at the time also did not recognize dual citizenship, meaning 
if Obama became Indonesian, then as far as that country was concerned, his U.S. 
citizenship was no longer recognized by Indonesia. But U.S. law would still 
recognize Obama as an American citizen.</p>
<p>In a revelation that raised a few eyebrows, Obama last April disclosed he 
traveled as a college student to Pakistan in 1981.</p>
<p>"I traveled to Pakistan when I was in college – I knew what Sunni and Shia 
was [sic] before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee," Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html">reportedly 
stated at a fundraising event.</a></p>
<p>The senator had not previously discussed any <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink3" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,3);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,3);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,3);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative;">trip</span></font></a> 
to Pakistan, either in his books or in scores of policy talks regarding 
Pakistan.</p>
<p>Prompted by Obama's statements, <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/obamas-college.html%20">ABC 
News contacted the presidential candidate's campaign</a>, which affirmed that in 
1981 – the year Obama transferred from Occidental College to Columbia University 
– Obama visited his mother and sister Maya in Indonesia. Obama then went on to 
Pakistan with a friend from college whose family was from that country, the 
campaign said.</p>
<p>Obama was in Pakistan for about three weeks, said the campaign, staying with 
his friend's family in Karachi and also visiting Hyderabad in Southern 
India.</p>
<p>Pakistan in 1981 was under <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink4" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,4);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,4);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,4);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative;">military</span></font></a> 
rule. It was difficult for U.S. citizens to travel to the country without 
assistance. It would have been easier for someone to enter Pakistan on an 
Indonesian <a class="kLink" oncontextmenu="return false;" id="KonaLink5" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,5);" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline ! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,5);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,5);" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=72656#" target="_top"><font style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: static;" color="blue"><span class="kLink" style="border-bottom: 1px solid blue; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; color: blue ! important; font-family: 'Times New Roman',Georgia,Serif; position: relative; background-color: transparent;">passport</span></font></a>.</p>
<p>If Obama indeed possessed Indonesian citizenship as a child, it is unlikely 
he retains such citizenship. The country's bylaws require any Indonesian citizen 
living abroad for more than five years to formally declare his intention to 
return, otherwise risk losing his citizenship status. The law does not 
necessarily mean Indonesian citizenship would be immediately lost. The law can 
be overruled by ministerial order.</p>
<p>Obama's registration in Indonesia under the name "Barry Soetoro" also raises 
questions as to whether he adopted that name in the U.S. at any time. According 
to <a href="http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=986412167">Illinois state 
filings</a>, when Obama registered as an attorney in 1991, under the name Barack 
Obama, he stated he did not have any former names.</p></div>]]></content></entry></feed>